Thursday, 1 November 2007

Editors' code of practice

Editors’ Code of Practice


This is the newspaper and periodical industry’s Code of Practice.

It is framed and revised by the Editors’Code Committee made up of independent editors of national, regional and local newspapers and magazines. The Press Complaints Commission, which has a majority of lay members, is charged with enforcing the Code, using it to adjudicate complaints. It was ratified by the PCC on the 1 August 2007. Clauses marked* are covered by exceptions relating to the public interest.


The Code


All members of the press have a duty to maintain the highest professional standards. The Code, which includes this preamble and the public interest exceptions below, sets the benchmark for those ethical standards, protecting both the rights of the individual and the public's right to know. It is the cornerstone of the system of selfregulation to which the industry has made a binding commitment.


It is essential that an agreed code be honoured not only to the letter but in the full spirit. It should not be interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its commitment to respect the rights of the individual, nor so broadly that it constitutes an unnecessary interference with freedom of expression or prevents publication in the public interest.


It is the responsibility of editors and publishers to apply the Code to editorial material in both printed and online versions of publications. They should take care to ensure it is observed rigorously by all editorial staff and external contributors, including non-journalists.

Editors should co-operate swiftly with the PCC in the resolution of complaints. Any publication judged to have breached the Code must print the adjudication in full and with due prominence, including headline reference to the PCC.


1 Accuracy
i) The press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information,including pictures.


ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and - where appropriate - an apology published.


iii) The press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.


iv) A publication must report fairly and accurately the outcome of an action for defamation to which it has been a party, unless an agreed settlement states otherwise, or an agreed statement is published.


2 Opportunity to reply
A fair opportunity for reply to inaccuracies must be given when reasonably called for.


3 * Privacy
i) Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications. Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent.


ii) It is unacceptable to photograph individuals in a private place without their consent. Note - Private places are public or private property where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.


4 * Harassment
i) Journalists must not engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit.


ii) They must not persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing individuals once asked to desist; nor remain on their property when asked to leave and must not follow them.


iii) Editors must ensure these principles are observed by those working for them and take care not to use non-compliant material from other sources.


5 Intrusion into grief or shock
i) In cases involving personal grief or shock, enquiries and approaches must be made with sympathy and discretion and publication handled sensitively. This should not restrict the
right to report legal proceedings, such as inquests.


* ii) When reporting suicide, care should be taken to avoid excessive detail about the method used.


6 * Children
i) Young people should be free to complete their time at school without unnecessary intrusion.


ii) A child under 16 must not be interviewed or photographed on issues involving their own or another child’s welfare unless a custodial parent or similarly responsible adult consents.


iii) Pupils must not be approached or photographed at school without the permission of the school authorities.


iv) Minors must not be paid for material involving children’s welfare, nor parents or guardians for material about their children or wards, unless it is clearly in the child's interest.


v) Editors must not use the fame, notoriety or position of a parent or guardian as sole justification for publishing details of a child’s private life.


7 * Children in sex cases
1. The press must not, even if legally free to do so, identify children under 16 who are victims or witnesses in cases involving sex offences.


2. In any press report of a case involving a sexual offence against a child -


i) The child must not be identified.


ii) The adult may be identified

.
iii) The word "incest" must not be used where a child victim might be identified.


iv) Care must be taken that nothing in the report implies the relationship between the accused and the child.


8 * Hospitals
i) Journalists must identify themselves and obtain permission from a responsible executive before entering non-public areas of hospitals or similar institutions to pursue enquiries.


ii) The restrictions on intruding into privacy are particularly relevant to enquiries about individuals in hospitals or similar institutions.


9 * Reporting of Crime
i) Relatives or friends of persons convicted or accused of crime should not generally be identified without their consent, unless they are genuinely relevant to the story.


ii) Particular regard should be paid to the potentially vulnerable position of children who witness, or are victims of, crime. This should not restrict the right to report legal proceedings.


10 * Clandestine devices and subterfuge
i) The press must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine listening devices; or by intercepting private or mobile telephone calls, messages or emails; or by the unauthorised removal of documents, or photographs; or by accessing digitally-held private information without consent.


ii) Engaging in misrepresentation or subterfuge, including by agents or intermediaries, can generally be justified only in the public interest and then only when the material cannot be obtained by other means.


11 Victims of sexual assault
The press must not identify victims of sexual assault or publish material likely to contribute to such identification unless there is adequate justification and they are legally free to do so.


12 Discrimination
i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's race, colour, religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.


ii) Details of an individual's race, colour, religion, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability must be avoided unless genuinely relevant to the story.


13 Financial journalism
i) Even where the law does not prohibit it, journalists must not use for their own profit financial information they receive in advance of its general publication, nor should they pass such information to others.


ii) They must not write about shares or securities in whose performance they know that they or their close families have a significant financial interest without disclosing the interest to the editor or financial editor.


iii) They must not buy or sell, either directly or through nominees or agents, shares or securities about which they have written recently or about which they intend to write in the near future.


14 Confidential sources
Journalists have a moral obligation to protect confidential sources of information.


15 Witness payments in criminal trials
i) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981.


This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by
police without charge or bail or the proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has
announced its verdict.


* ii) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought demonstrably to be published in the
public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings
influence the evidence those witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be
conditional on the outcome of a trial.


* iii) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to the prosecution and defence. The witness must be advised of this requirement.


16 * Payment to criminals
i) Payment or offers of payment for stories, pictures or information, which seek to
exploit a particular crime or to glorify or glamorise crime in general, must not be made directly or via agents to convicted or confessed criminals or to their associates – who may include family, friends and colleagues.


ii) Editors invoking the public interest to justify payment or offers would need to demonstrate that there was good reason to believe the public interest would be served. If, despite payment, no public interest emerged, then the material should not be published.


PCC Guidance Notes
Court Reporting (1994)
Reporting of international sporting events (1998)
Prince William and privacy (1999)
On the reporting of cases involving paedophiles (2000)
The Judiciary and harassment (2003)
Refugees and Asylum Seekers (2003)
Lottery Guidance Note (2004)
On the reporting of people accused of crime (2004)
Data Protection Act, Journalism and the PCC Code (2005)
Editorial co-operation (2005)
Financial Journalism: Best Practice Note (2005)
On the reporting of mental health issues (2006)
The extension of the PCC’s remit to include editorial audio-visual material on websites (2007)
Copies of the above can be obtained online at www.pcc.org.uk
Press Complaints Commission Halton House, 20/23 Holborn, London EC1N 2JD
Telephone: 020 7831 0022 Fax: 020 7831 0025
Textphone: 020 7831 0123 (for deaf or hard of hearing people)
Helpline: 0845 600 2757
The public interest There may be exceptions to the clauses marked * where they can be demonstrated to be in the public interest.
1. The public interest includes, but is not confined to:
i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious impropriety.
ii) Protecting public health and safety.
iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an action or statement of an individual or organisation.
2. There is a public interest in freedom of expression itself.
3. Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully how the public interest was served.
4. The PCC will consider the extent to which material is already in the public domain, or will become so.
5. In cases involving children under 16, editors must demonstrate an exceptional public interest to over-ride the normally paramount interest of the child.







Thursday, 18 October 2007

Podcast Tutorial

By Sam Park

This tutorial is aimed at showing you how to upload and distribute documentation as opposed to audio/video, via podcasting technology.

The tecnique allows distribution of written documents as images, without copying down the text word by word, which would be useful for more widely distribiuting documents where copies of the original are scarce.

A negative aspect of this is that the producer talks about 'RSS feeds' without explaining what they are, this could leave viewers not fully understanding the process.

Thursday, 11 October 2007

User generated content and journalism: Friends or foes?

By Sam Park

Several positive and negative aspects to emerged from the rise of user generated content, some of them pose a threat to traditional professional journalism, where others open doors to a new and unlimited dimension of journalism.

One of the main threats to journalists is the recent increase in the use of blogs and social networking sites, and the emergence affordable quality camera/recording equipment. These developments allow anyone to become a "journalist" and could potentially lead to the decay of professional journalism. ]

An example of how anyone can make a successful media career from nothing is Perez Hilton. His real identity is Mario Armando Lavandeira, an American man who began blogging on Hollywood because he thought it would be easy, and has gone on to have massive success. Although this is an example of celebrity based journalism it still shows that anyone can make an impact in the media world.

The rise of user generated content has not only put the individual journalist under threat, it has also made media executives feel that, if they cannot control the media's content, they lose a substantial part of their power. A report published by Accenture highlighted this; Gavin Mann digital lead for Accenture’s Media &Entertainment said: “ This is just the beginning of a rapidly changing landscape where the media content environment grows more fractious and the user gains more control and power.”

One of the positive aspects of this form of media is the uncensored, unmediated potential that it provides journalists with and the unlimited points of view, angles and sources in order to create the best story possible. A good recent example is the crisis in Burma, where the military dictatorship censored the events by banning most foreign media and playing down the numbers of casualties and deaths. To counter this the people of Burma with access to the internet created blogs to report the truth, especially in terms of facts and figures regarding casualties and deaths.

Another good side is that anyone can get there own point of view across in order to defend themselves or publish real-life problems. It stops news production from being an oligopoly and so provides a wider contextual base for the bias of stories and can help to break up the narrow ideological production values perpetuated by the mainstream media. Examples of this are quick and easy blogs and websites set up by minority and marginalised groups allowing them to put their point of view across to the entire world. The black fist blog, for instance, seeks to shatter the illusions of the mainstream American media

In conclusion there seems to be an even distribution of positive and negative aspects in the new world of user generated content, although I feel that the a modern journalist must learn to adapt to counter the negative aspects by keeping their professionalism higher than amateur efforts and by using good judgement to assess the quality and reliabilty of independent online sources.

If this can be achieved, the world of journalism is set to change with more people from all over the world having more of say and a better chance of representation in the mainstream media.